This tracker lists reported actions, complaints, court and regulator actions and notable Indian data incidents discussed in the DPDP context. We use neutral wording. An entry here is not a finding that anyone broke the law. See the editorial policy.
Tracker (11 entries)
- Reported
AU Small Finance Bank
AU Small Finance Bank said it was investigating a potential data leak involving a Salesforce-hosted platform holding limited data on its vehicle loan customers, after a hacker group claimed to hold KYC, PAN, Aadhaar and loan records. The bank said its own systems were unaffected, and Inc42 could not independently verify the group's claims.
- Reported
Data Protection Board of India
BusinessLine reported, citing a senior MeitY official, that the process to appoint the Board's Chairperson and Members was moving forward and the Board would be in place soon, but that no exact timeline could be committed. The report followed the Kerala High Court's expectation that the Board be made functional within eight weeks.
- Complaint filed
Central Board of Film Certification (eCinePramaan portal)
A report alleged unauthorised access to film certification documents on the CBFC eCinePramaan portal. CBFC said it found no trace of the documents claimed to have been accessed, filed a complaint with cybercrime authorities as a matter of caution, and notified CERT-In.
- Reported
Data Protection Board of India
The Economic Times reported that an RTI response showed the Board had spent nothing on salaries, office expenses, rent or ICT equipment as of 30 September 2026, with Consent Manager registration due to start on 13 November 2026.
- Court order
Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA v. Union of India)
The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre on a petition by the Digital News Publishers Association challenging provisions of the DPDP Act and Rules for lacking an exemption for journalism. The bench declined an interim stay without hearing the government and listed the matter for 17 November 2026.
- Court order
Google India (student's writ petition, Punjab and Haryana High Court)
The Punjab and Haryana High Court issued notice to Google India and the Centre on a writ petition by a student locked out of his Google accounts since his phone was stolen, who alleges Google did not act on a Grievance Appellate Committee order to help him recover his data. The petition argues under the DPDP Act that loss of access is a personal data breach and that Google's two-year inactive account deletion policy conflicts with the Act and Rules; the matter is listed for 20 November 2026.
- Reported
State Bank of India
SBI disclosed to the stock exchanges that personal details of 3,897 customers were identified among records found on the dark web, after alerts from the Defence Cyber Agency and CERT-In. SBI said it engaged a CERT-In empanelled agency to investigate the alleged compromise.
- Court order
Union of India and Digi Yatra Foundation (C.R. Neelakandan v. Union of India)
In a PIL raising privacy concerns about Digi Yatra, the Kerala High Court recorded the Centre's submission that the Board had been constituted but was not functional, and said it expected the Board to be made functional within eight weeks. The PIL was disposed of.
- Reported
Reliance group (server hosted by a third-party provider)
Reliance reportedly confirmed a partial breach of data on a server hosted by a third-party provider, according to Reuters as cited by MediaNama. MediaNama reported the leaked files included material related to the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant. CERT-In was reportedly looking into it.
- Reported
Ultrahuman
Wearable maker Ultrahuman said attackers gained read-only access to some users' contact details, transaction history and fitness-related data in an incident on 27 March 2026, and informed affected users on 2 June 2026. It said no passwords or payment data were affected.
- Sectoral regulator action
Star Health and Allied Insurance
IRDAI imposed a penalty of 3.39 crore rupees and issued a warning for violations of the IRDAI Information and Cyber Security Guidelines, 2023, according to the company's stock exchange intimation. The insurer had faced a cyber attack and customer data leak in 2024. This is a sectoral regulator action, not a DPDP Act penalty.
What the labels mean
- Reported Reported in the media or disclosed by the entity. No official finding.
- Complaint filed A complaint has been filed with an authority (for example police, CERT-In or a court). No finding.
- Court order A court has passed an order or direction in a related matter. Not a Board order.
- Sectoral regulator action A sectoral regulator other than the Board has acted under its own law.
- Board order An order or direction of the Data Protection Board of India.
- Board penalty A monetary penalty imposed by the Data Protection Board of India under section 33.
Recent coverage
DPDP and Indian data breach stories picked up automatically from bharat.digital on each rebuild. Headlines link to the original publishers.
- MeitY launches DEPA handbook to enable secure data sharing for AI training
- Special newsletter: Unanswered questions, October edition
- Fake Video Falsely Shows India's Defence Minister Criticizing Army
- CoinSwitch Fixes Temporary Outage After Traffic Spike
- MeitY Floats New Privacy-Led Framework To Unlock Data For Training AI Models
- Data Protection Board to be in place ‘pretty soon’: Government Sources
- AU Small Finance Bank data breach: Hackers threaten to leak Aadhaar, PAN and customer records
- Rs. 300 Cr lost in AI cyberattacks on NBFCs: Why did the public learn about it from the media, not regulators?
- In favour of press freedom: 10 changes that could be made in the DPDP Act
- AI-powered cyberattacks siphon ₹300 crore from small NBFCs in two months
Data: /data/enforcement.json. New entries by RSS: what changed. Tracker updated 2026-11-01.